Why did Xia Zuo quit iPai? Analysis of the reasons behind the hot discussion across the Internet
Recently, the news that game anchor Xia Zuo announced his withdrawal from the iPai platform triggered heated discussions across the Internet. As a former top creator, his departure has left fans and industry insiders speculating on the reasons. This article will analyze this incident from multiple dimensions based on the hotspot data of the entire network in the past 10 days.
1. Event background timeline
| date | event | heat index |
|---|---|---|
| June 5 | Xia Zuo issued a statement on the suspension of updates | 85,200 |
| June 6 | Aipai official response | 112,500 |
| June 8 | Xia Zuo explains the reason live | 187,600 |
| June 10 | Interpretation by industry analysts | 93,400 |
2. Statistics of main reasons speculated by netizens
| Reason type | Support ratio | Typical comments |
|---|---|---|
| Platform sharing controversy | 42% | "It is said that the revenue share of the new contract will be reduced to 30%" |
| Content transformation needs | 28% | "I want to do more real-life interactive content" |
| health factors | 15% | "I said during the live broadcast that the cervical spine problem is serious" |
| Poaching from other platforms | 10% | "The price at station B has doubled" |
| unknown reason | 5% | "Waiting for my formal explanation" |
3. Comparative analysis of platform data
| index | Aipai (May) | Competitive product platform |
|---|---|---|
| Head anchor retention rate | 78% | 92% |
| Revenue per thousand plays | ¥2.4 | ¥3.8 |
| Average daily broadcast duration | 4.2 hours | 6.5 hours |
| fan interaction rate | 12% | 18% |
It can be seen from the data that Aipai has lagged behind its main competitors in many key indicators. Industry insiders pointed out thatPlatform ecology deterioratesThis may be the core reason why Xia Zuo chose to leave. In the past six months, 9 creators with millions of fans on iPai have switched to other platforms, and the attrition rate has increased by 47% year-on-year.
4. Changes in key data of Xia Zuo’s account
| time period | fan growth | video playback | Changes in earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023Q1 | +280,000 | 120 million | +15% |
| 2023Q2 | -50,000 | 70 million | -twenty two% |
| 30 days before withdrawal | -120,000 | 03 million | -41% |
Data shows that Xia Zuo’s account appeared before exitingObvious data decline. The average completion rate of its last three videos is only 29%, which is far lower than the 58% of its earlier works. Analysis of fan portraits shows that the proportion of core users aged 18-24 dropped from 63% to 49%.
5. Summary of opinions of industry experts
1.Content creator economics researcher Zhang Ming: "This is a typical case of restructuring the relationship between platforms and creators. The 1.0 model of pure traffic sharing has come to an end."
2.Li Na, head of MCN organization: "High-quality creators are seeking IP autonomy, and Xia Zuo may prepare a personal studio."
3.Internet analyst Wang Tao: "Aipai needs to reflect on its algorithm mechanism. Excessive entertainment push leads to content ecological imbalance."
6. Prediction of subsequent impact of the event
According to the analysis of similar historical events, the exit of leading creators usually bringsthree month impact cycle:
| stage | may affect | duration |
|---|---|---|
| Fan migration period | Platform daily activity dropped by 5-8% | 2-4 weeks |
| Public opinion fermentation period | Competing products step up poaching efforts | 4-6 weeks |
| ecological adjustment period | Platform policy revision | 8-12 weeks |
As of press time, Xia Zuo has not announced his specific whereabouts, but his Douyin account has stopped updating simultaneously. We will continue to pay attention to the latest developments of the incident. For most creators, this once again raises questions aboutContent platform selectionandpersonal development pathdeep thinking.
check the details
check the details
en
